It had to be said.
Most other websites, media outlets and such sided with Mr. Levido. I however chose not to because I do not want to see NZ become a litigious state like the US where if some one has a petty issue with someone else it is sorted out with great cost through a legal system that should be dealing with more important matters.
I do not think that asking for a $1000 for humiliation, and a $1000 bar tab are justified in this case.
What was intended was to point out some inadequacies in the Human Rights Act. I agree with Chris when he says: “We should not be punished because the state chooses to dislike our prejudices and beliefs.” Debate is one of the cornerstones of our society. Our parliament debates, Courts of law have debates, we debate for fun, and we debate on this website. I was taking the, obviously, unpopular, side in this debate.
I am sorry for insulting Mr. Levido, this was not intended. I retract and withdraw my previous blog post.
I would like to extend the hand of friendship to Mr. Levido and bury the hatchet over a quiet beer in the Big K, or another such establishment of his chosing.
We tried calling Mr. Levido this morning but his phone was engaged. Norman, if you would like to call us again at a time of your choosing please do so on 04 463 6766.